Thursday, November 21, 2013

"For Rulers Hold No Terror for those Who Do RIght" - Really?

Are you a church-going, Bible-believing Christian?

Does your pastor preach "submission to the governing authorities"?

Does he preach that "rulers hold no terror for those who do right"? Do you believe that this is true in the case of those who currently rule the United States of America? Do you really?

You might want to read the piece below, from Pastor Bill Wilson who is, in my mind, a pastor after God's own heart, for he rightly points out that this "president" of ours is not only funding and arming Islamic terrorists in places like Libya and Syria abroad, but also right here in the United States, as now even mainstream news outlets like ABC News report!

The president's deadly partner

The occupant of the Oval Office has opened the doors for a groundbreaking foreign policy partner to establish itself in the United States. This partner has been instrumental in the Administration's plans across the Middle East, especially in Libya, Tunisia, Egypt and, now, Syria. The US has funneled millions of hard earned tax dollars to support this foreign policy partner in advancing the Administration's goals. Now, it's offices in Kentucky were revealed by ABC News. They contain explosives, machine guns, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and ammunition to be sent to the front lines in Afghanistan and Iraq--to kill American soldiers. The offices are a self storage stall in Bowling Green and the partner is al Qaeda.

ABC News reports the FBI has revealed: "Several dozen suspected terrorist bombmakers, including some believed to have targeted American troops, may have mistakenly been allowed to move to the United States as war refugees." The Department of Homeland Security told ABC News that the US government is continuously improving its vetting procedures on immigrants and refugees. But in testimony before the House, a DHS senior official said that the Kentucky al Qaeda members names and fingerprints were checked by the FBI, the DHS and the Defense Department and they "came in clean." At first, DHS defended it's procedure. Then it said it was improving its procedure. Then it said it was a mistake.

But is it really a mistake? Or did the FBI just happen into something that this Administration was systematically allowing? It is widely documented that the White House was in league with al Qaeda in Libya, for example, when the Arab Spring was in full swing. Through the Muslim Brotherhood, also documented as having agents appointed to high places in the Department of Homeland Security, the Pentagon and State Department (remember Huma Abedin under Hillary Clinton?), al Qaeda is positioned as a foreign policy partner of the president. Al Qaeda is in the strange role of being a killer of American soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, and a killer of American enemies in Libya, Tunisia, and Syria. 

In January 2012, WorldNetDaily reported that there were 35 terrorist training camps across the US on hundreds of purchased or leased acres where organizations like Jamaat ul-Fuqra (Muslims in America) conduct "the most advanced training courses in Islamic military warfare," according to it's leader Sheikh Mubarak Gilani. Yet the State Department refuses to designate the organization as a terrorist group. What next, al Jazeera--the foremost terrorist propaganda arm--will become a credentialed news network in America? Oh, excuse me. That has already happened. Jesus warned us in Matthew 24:4, "Take heed that no man deceive you." Something is terribly amiss, and it all points to the White House. 

Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

PASTORS OF AMERICA:

Are you a pastor of a church?

Do you believe you are doing God's work in your calling?

Should you be warning your congregation about things like this?

Ex-US Agent Claims Military Thwarted Obama False Flag Nuke/EMP Attack this Fall


 Or do you believe it is not your business to interfere with what your government has in store for your congregation and the country?

Do you believe that Romans 13 prevents you from preaching against "your" government (i.e., it's so-called leader) attempting to EMP-blast the entire country back into the 1800's?

Since you are probably not going to click on that link, please let me summarize:

1.  Obama ordered that 3 nukes be transported in a major breach of protocol and safety regulations of long standing. He wanted it NOW, and these officers were made aware of what the intention was. 

2. One Admiral had one Navy nuke taken 200 miles off South Carolina and detonated deep in the ocean. The other 2 nukes disappeared thanks to the handiwork of two Generals, the numbers 1 and 2 men in charge of the Army ordinance. 

3.  Look up the events of two U.S. Generals and one U.S. Admiral being dismissed in the past two weeks and you will find their names.

4.   Mr. Obama’s intention was to set off the three nukes to devastate all computer related systems on the continent thus taking America back 200 years and guaranteeing a total breakdown in society and with in one year the death of 300 million Americans.

Okay, to be fair, it is possible that this report is not true. Granted - but isn't it also possible that it indeed is true?

Do you think that it might be appropriate to move heaven and earth in order to try and find out whether or not this report is true? Do you think the risk of it being untrue is by far outweighed by the risk that it might be accurate?

Do you think that you might owe your congregation the favor of at least pointing out to them that an act of this nature is even conceivable coming from a person who holds the official title "President of the United States"?

What makes it conceivable?

We only have to look to well-publicized facts: (1) Obama has used US taxpayer funded military assets to remove a secular dictator in Libya and funded Al-Queda-linked rebels to destroy that country's existing government. (2) He is currently in the process of funding more Al-Queda linked "rebels" in order to repeat the same process in Syria. (3) he has stood silent while four Americans were raped and murdered in Benghazi after he helped "liberate" that country from its legitimate government. (4) He claims - and has repeatedly used - the power to unilaterally execute US citizens suspected of terrorism without giving them a trial or even the right to be heard - all the while he funds and arms actual terrorists in Syria.

Do you still think, at all, or are you just trying to go along to get along so your tax-deductible donations pipeline won't run dry?

We have a "president" in the white house who has committed so many atrocities and treasonous acts during his illicit reign that the fact that Congress has not removed him from his position and evicted him from the white house justifies Americans scrapping their entire government and starting over again - but you stand behind your pulpit and preach obedience to THIS state??

If that is what you do - what does that make you? I do not expect an answer from you - but you owe one to yourself. And to God.


Friday, November 15, 2013

Chuck Baldwin's "ROMANS 13: SETTING IT STRAIGHT"


By Chuck Baldwin
July 28, 2011
NewsWithViews.com

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the biggest reason America is in the mess that it's in today is directly due to the apathy and indifference of the American pulpit. I am reminded of what Charles Finney, the famed 19th Century revivalist, said: "If there is a decay of conscience, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the public press lacks moral discernment, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the church is degenerate and worldly, the pulpit is responsible for it. If the world loses its interest in Christianity, the pulpit is responsible for it. If Satan rules in our halls of legislation, the pulpit is responsible for it. If our politics become so corrupt that they very foundations of our government are ready to fall away, the pulpit is responsible for it."

Our second President, John Adams, put it this way: "It is the duty of the clergy to accommodate their discourses to the times, to preach against such sins as are most prevalent, and recommend such virtues as are most wanted. For example, if exorbitant ambition and venality are predominate, ought they not to warn their hearers against those vices? If public spirit is much wanted, should they not inculcate this great virtue? If the rights and duties of Christian magistrates and subjects are disputed, should they not explain them, show their nature, ends, limitations, and restrictions, howmuchsoever it may move the gall of Massachusetts?"

Martin Luther, the great Protestant reformer, was even more direct. He said, "If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every portion of the truth of God except precisely that little point which the world and the devil are at the moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christ. Where the battle rages, there the loyalty of the soldier is proved. And to be steady on all the battle fields besides is merely flight and disgrace if he flinches at that point."

For at least the past half-century Christian pastors and churches have been all but neutered. On the whole, they have ignored Christ's admonition to be the "salt of the earth," and as a result, have failed to do much of anything to preserve freedom's Biblical Natural Law principles in this great land. In fact, the average church is so sugary sweet that it is downright sickening!

And the two main reasons for this dereliction of duty by America's pastors and churches are the IRS 501c3 non-profit tax status, which turns the Lord's church into a government corporation; and the erroneous, fallacious interpretation of Romans chapter 13 that teaches Christians are obligated to submit to government regardless of whether government acts within the confines and jurisdiction of God's law or not. In reality, the American church today, on the whole, is not even a church. It is a government corporation whose loyalty is offered first to Caesar, not to Christ, and whose message is first politically correct before it is Biblically correct.

It is more than interesting that some 95% of the 14,000 evangelical churches that graced the German landscape during Hitler's rise to power bought into the identical misinterpretation of Romans 13 that the vast majority (probably at least 95%) of the 300,000 evangelical churches that grace America's landscape have bought into today.
For example, one German pastor in 1933 gushed, "Christ has come to us through Hitler." In like manner, many pastors today foolishly preach that God directs us through our President (whoever he is), or our Supreme Court, or virtually any other government agency. And speaking of the ignominious infatuation with government by Nazi-era German clergymen, Erwin Lutzer, in his brilliant book, "Hitler's Cross", wrote, "The swastika meant more to some pastors than did the Cross." And there is absolutely no question that many pastors in America today place far more value on the US flag (symbolizing to them the power and authority of the state) than they do the Cross of Christ or the teachings and authority of the Holy Scriptures.

Without a doubt, tyrants of all stripes love to exploit this asinine attitude of these sheepish, slavish preachers who idolize the state! Lutzer quotes Hitler as saying, "The parsons will dig their own graves. They will betray their God to us. They will betray anything for the sake of their miserable jobs and incomes." And that is exactly what many pastors, deacons, elders, and churchmen are doing today: for the sake of their paychecks, insurance premiums, and retirement benefits, they are betraying the lawful authority of Christ to the tyrannical authority of the state. And the bastardized teaching of Romans 13 is one of the major tools by which this is being done.

Therefore, before we can see any significant return to legitimate constitutional government in this country, the thinking and philosophy of Christians and churches regarding Romans 13 must change. This is absolutely obligatory!
The reality of the importance of a proper understanding of Romans 13 was the impetus behind my constitutional attorney son, Tim Baldwin, and me co-authoring an in-depth analysis of Romans 13, which is entitled "Romans 13: The True Meaning of Submission." This book is absolutely a must read, if I do say so myself! We quote hundreds of scriptures from both Testaments, along with hundreds of quotations from Christian apologists, theologians, and philosophers throughout history. Quite frankly, I do not know of another book such as this on the market today.

To order "Romans 13: The True Meaning of Submission," click here.
In the same vein as the book, I delivered a four-part message series entitled "The True Meaning of Romans 13." This four-part message series is now available on one DVD. In fact, the four-part message series is simply a condensed version of the book. To order my four-part message series, "The True Meaning of Romans 13," click here.

If I may be so bold, I suggest that readers order both the book and the DVD. The DVD can be used for those folks who prefer to watch a video presentation, and the book can be used for those folks who desire a more in-depth understanding of the subject. And may I further suggest that you obtain as many copies as you can to give away to your friends, relatives, co-workers, and fellow church members? It is absolutely critical to the reclamation and maintenance of liberty that a proper understanding of Romans 13 be obtained. Without it, we are going to continue down the same road toward socialism and oppression, as surely as did Hitler's Germany.

I cannot think of a more important book or DVD that you could purchase this year! If every reader of this column would purchase one or more of these books and DVDs, and put as many as possible into the hands of others, think of the potential impact this could have upon our country!
Again, to order the book "Romans 13: The True Meaning of Submission," click here.
And, to order my four-part message series, "The True Meaning of Romans 13" on one DVD, click here.
Plus, let me again remind readers that Liberty Fellowship here in Kalispell, Montana, is a non-501c3 Christian fellowship that preaches the unadulterated truth of Scripture with an emphasis on Biblical Natural Law freedom principles that does not bow the knee to Baal or Caesar! To see the difference between this and your typical 501c3 state church, tune in each Sunday afternoon at 2:30pm (MST) and watch our service livestreamed. Click here to watch my message live online.

Or, to watch or download my archived video messages, click here.
I began this column with quotes from Charles Finney, John Adams, and Martin Luther. Let me end with a quote from Winston Churchill: "If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."


It is also opportune that my latest video message is entitled, "Arise, And Fight!" taken from the book of Nehemiah. This is also a message you won't want to miss. Watch it here.
Please get in the fight! Help us get the message out about the true meaning of Romans 13. Never was a book more necessary!

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.
© 2011 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Can the "Christian Message" set you free? Really??

What is the Christian message, at heart?

The Christian message (the "gospel" if you will) is that you are FREE! Free even to decide against God and his human form, Jesus Christ.

Why?

Because you have the power to make up your own mind. To DECIDE which way to go in life, and thereafter.

That power was given to you at birth. It did not come from your parent, who themselves received it a their birth. It is the result of the way you are made. All humans share this in common.

So IF you accept that there is a creator, whatever you prefer to call him (or "it", if you insist) you can't help but admit that your power to decide comes from him.

If he did that, this act of his makes him worthy of our respect, even of our love, for why else would he do that if not out of love?

That power to decide is true freedom. No one can take that away from us. Not by threat of force, not by imprisoning us, and not by any form of coercion. Even if we feel our will is overcome by superior force, we still have the power to resist, to simply say "NO!" It will have consequences - but so does slavish compliance.

So what does "Jesus" have to do with any of this?

He is the one who dealt with our foundational problem of human existence.

Christians believe (and when I look around in the world of men, I cannot help but agree) that man is infected with something called the "sin nature" from birth. This is not personal sin, mind you. A newborn baby has had no chance to commit any personal sins. Yet. But he or she has the capacity to commit sin(s).

Christians go even further.

They maintain that not only does every human have the capacity to commit sins, but they believe a human cannot help but to commit them!

That one is a really big thing that irks most believers in the innate goodness of man. They believe that "if only" this or that negative influence on people is removed from society, then humans can live in peace, freedom, and prosperity ever after. So far, history has proven them to be Utopians, no less than some of the more easily recognized ones (such as socialists, communists, voluntarists, etc.)

So, let's assume for a moment that this is true, that this condition is a "genetic marker" so to speak that follows us humans around wherever we go, whatever we do, as long as we are alive. There is no human way out of this. Therefore, there is a need for divine intervention.

Jesus Christ is believed by Christians to be the solution to that enigma. He is God himself, in human form (the "son" aspect of the holy trinity) who became human so he could take our collective sins (of all humans, past, present, and future) upon himself in order to have them "judged" in him so that we would have an OPTION.

The option we were given that way is to "accept" this offer, this supreme sacrifice by God himself on our behalf, and thus to escape the inevitable "judgment" that God will have to pronounce upon all those who continue to choose their sin nature while ignoring God's incredibly gracious offer.

We were given the option to "accept" this offer by faith. Nothing else could allow us to accept it. None of our own flesh-driven actions ever could, because everything we do or touch is by definition infected with the same sin nature that is in us.

This can never be proven in any scientific or logically supportable way because it was set up to be done only by faith. Faith simply means to express positive volition to: (a) the notion of the existence of a God who even cares about humanity, much less every single individual ever born in time, including you, and (b) the notion that this creator-God did what Christians claim he did in becoming man and literally purchasing our freedom from sin by his own sacrifice and suffering.

What was his "suffering"?

Not the Romans flogging him and smashing every facial bone of his human form. Not really. Not the hanging on the cross from nails driven through his wrists and ankles. Not the psychological torture his own people, the Jews heaped upon him by calling him names and ridiculing him and giving him up to the hated Roman overlord authorities. No. Not that.

His suffering came in a different form, but to understand it, you have to "accept" (or momentarily assume the truth of, for the sake of our argument here) of a few precepts:

a. You have to accept that Jesus Christ was both fully man and fully God (not a "demigod").

b. You have to accept that his birth to a virgin without a human father enabled him to be born in human form, but without the genetic sin nature that is passed down from generation to generation by the act of human conception (i.e., that it is passed down by man, not by woman (so much for the notion that Christianity is "sexist" and values man "over" women).

c. You have to accept that the human Christ was able to live a life that was totally free from both personal sin and the inherited sin nature, and that he (as "the Son") was therefore at all times "with" or one with God, the Father every moment of his life.

Once you accept these premises (only for argument's sake, of course), you can now understand the nature of his true suffering, at least within this context.

According to the biblical gospels, there was a three-hour time span when Jesus hung upon that cross, when the sun was blotted out and there was total darkness. That darkness was pierced by an inhuman shrieking of an agony that no man or woman has ever felt before that moment, and will ever fell thereafter as long as human beings exist. It was the shrieking in utter desperation of a man who had never known a moment in time when he was not also identical "with God" who had suddenly not only lost that status, but who was suddenly immersed in every single sin ever committed in human existence - past, present, and future - as our collective sins were poured into and through his body while he was utterly separated from God.

It was then when he screamed, at the top of his considerable lung and voice-box capacity: "Eli, Eli! Lams shabbachtani??!!" ("My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?")

His shrieking signifies (to Christians) that Jesus died two deaths on that cross: first the spiritual death of utter separation from God for the first time in his life. The second death was his physical death, when he finally expelled every last ounce of breath from his lungs and intentionally literally "expired" while hanging there (long before the Roman soldier's spear lanced his side, because when that happened, both "blood and water" came out of his wound - a physiological sign that death had already occurred hours earlier.

So: in Christian thought, God made us (and everything else), set us up with the greatest gift ever (free will), gave "us" (collectively in Adam and Eve) an opportunity to abandon him by providing an alternative belief system (Satan's) and then stepped into human affairs himself to provide us with a viable way out of that mess, if we so choose, by doing nothing more than believing him.

But that's not the end of the story. In a way, it is only the beginning.

Because, although expressing faith in God and what he did for us "saves" us from what is known as the "slave market of sin" in eternity (God does not go back on his word), it still leaves us wrestling with the problem of personal sin while we are still alive on earth (or possibly elsewhere) as human beings. But, there is even a way out of this.

We are told that by simply naming ("confessing")our (known) sins to him in the privacy of our own mind, he will forgive us those known since and cleanse us from all forgotten or not consciously recognized sins as well.

In doing so, he restores our capacity to have direct communication with him and to "live the spiritual life" he really designed for us. In that life, under the power of the third "person" (aspect) of the holy trinity, he allo3ws us to understand, put into context, and internalize (make our own by faith) the lessons we can learn (if we so desire) from the "stories" in the Bible.

I can tell you from my own personal experience that this kind of lifestyle beats anything I have ever known, read, heard of, or imagined. "Problems" that beset us and tormented us our for entire life can and do suddenly disappear into nothing, as if they never existed. Their ramifications are still there, but the "stinger" that tormented us before is suddenly gone. (I won't get into details here.)

So the point of all that is this:

1. True freedom comes from God (you cannot credit anyone or anything else with your ability to DECIDE what is best for you and your loved ones).

2. He WANTS us to be free - even from the consequences of our own personal and collective sin and sin-nature!

3. All you have to do to be free is to exercise your original gift of free will in favor of faith in him.

4. Even if you decide against him, your very ability to do so is a gift from him. That decision just has consequences (but those consequences are rather self-imposed because they are the result of our own free choice)

5. By not believing any of this, you are (theoretically) free from even those divine "consequences". Therefore the choice is truly yours. It cannot be coerced, because when it is coerced, your decision loses its validity to him.

All of this is the reason why there is such a battle going on for your mind, today.

All of the "political" and "cultural" influences you are exposed to by the so-called "world" (what we call the "establishment" is designed in one way or another to make you BELIEVE that you do not have this "free will" (or that, by exercising it, you are somehow "selfish" and not feeding into the greater good for the greater number).

If you "believe" in the "scientific" notion that you are just the sum of your brain functions and simply a product of your environment, and that free will is an illusion, you have no escape. (Interesting is that this still focuses on your BELIEF, i.e., faith. It is all about faith - one way or the other.

"Liberalism" or even "conservatism" (both forms of coercive statism) are belief systems that tell you you do not have this ability (or the right) to decide for yourself, or if you do, provide you with reasons why you should not exercise it to its fullest. (Even "conservatives" tell you there are certain thoughts or notions you should never entertain: for example that the US government had anything at all to do with 9-11. You are not allowed to question this in any shape, form, or fashion, or you risk being cast into the outer edges of conservative group-think darkness!).

Pure "voluntarism" is a great idea, but it is no more than that. it is utopian in its root because it fails to take into account the inherent fallibility of man. Controlled social experiments have shown the truth of the old adage that "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Give a man or woman any kind of power, and he or she will figure out ways to abuse it . It's our human default programming to believe in these types of human solutions. Again: it's faith itself that is the issue.

On the Problem of Fear:

Fear is the opposite of faith in God. Fear of anything is the BELIEF that something untoward or painful could happen to you - something beyond any immediate and recognized danger.  That's why fear is such a great tool in the tool chest of our (Satan-inspired) human controllers. Everything they do to control us is based on the deliberately fear-based action-reaction-solution paradigm where any particular action is calculated to cause the desired reaction in order to garner support for a preplanned "solution." In essence, fear is also a belief. It's the conviction that something evil will befall you unless you do "X".

Unfortunately, that human tendency has been widely abused by many religions, including "Christianity" in order to gain adherents, and that is what gives "Christianity" a well-deserved bad name. It has enabled to user human controllers to use religion (and especially religious "leaders" to drive people like cattle into their clutches. Chalk that up to the human default nature. Even believers are lead astray by their own fear-demons.

It should also be clear to everyone that the desire to control others itself is nothing more than a fear reaction. People with that desire pursue their nefarious schemes because they fear a loss of (perceived) control over their lives more than death itself.

Because they have no faith in God (whom they correctly suspect of being the creator of all freedom, which they fear like nothing else for the same reason) they have to protect themselves. Freedom for the masses is their biggest threat because it directly contravenes their sick desire for control. They are, therefore, the gate keepers to their own prisons, and they keep themselves locked in tight - all the while Satan watches in perfect glee, rubbing his hands together. He likes what they do.

The problem in what the controllers do is that they are also locking us into the very same prison, all the while deceiving themselves that by doing so, they reserve certain perceived "privileges" for themselves.

So what is the root of fear?

Spiritually speaking, the root of fear is our tendency to pursue something other than our relationship with God first, and to value that pursuit (whatever it is) as more worthy than God himself.

When we do that, me are condemning ourselves to the possibility of "loss" of whatever it is we assign such a high value to. This "something" could be the most benign and beneficial-sounding thing, human, or ideal  in the world, and it would still be off the mark, because we are not made that way. We are all made to fill that emptiness we feel inside ourselves with the creator himself, not with one of his creatures.

So, the answer to fear is God. When you put him in his rightful place in your life, your fear goes away because you know you can never lose him. The only thing that can make you lose him is your own decision to value (believe) something or someone else more than God - and fortunately, you have the power to decide not to do that, just as you have the power to decide to do exactly the opposite!

The power is yours. Unconditionally.The one who gave it to you is God - unless you have a better explanation. You can call that which gave you that power something else, like ?nature" or "the universe", or whatever, but in doing so you only affirm that you have that power.

The Purpose of this Post:

The purpose of this post is not to convince you that God is real and that you had better follow him, or else! The purpose is to give you information. Ideas. Food for your decision-making machine. Maybe some ideas you haven't considered yet.

It should be clear by now, though, that what is a threat to human Liberty is not God (how could he be, if you don't believe in him and he therefore doesn't exist?) but, at the most basic and common-sense level, our tendency to believe in something that has the potential to cause us a loss of some sort.

Conversely, it should be clear that IF you believe in the Christian model of reality and human history, a firm sense of gratitude to and therefore faith in God can be the antidote to this otherwise seemingly insurmountable fear-problem. The point is that either way, the issue is faith. Your faith! Where do you put yours? In human reason? In the original goodness of mankind? In science? In the powers of your own intellect? In the greater good of the greater number?

As long as you are still subject to fear, can you be free?

(The following question is for believers in Christ, only):

If God wants us to be free, would he want you, and all of us, to live under a tyrannical government that wants to convince us of the opposite (i.e., that freedom must be sacrificed for state-provided "security")? Do preachers, pastors, ministers, priests, whatever you call them, who preach subjection to the state as "God's will" based on a lazy and incorrect interpretation of Romans 13 really preach God's word? Should you really listen to them? Should you even tolerate them to talk to you and your fellow church members at every sermon.

If you are a Christian pastor, minister, or whatever, do you still believe that preaching Romans 13 as God's commandment for you and your congregation? Should you not break out of this prison of the soul and encourage your followers to do likewise? Should you not preach LIBERTY instead, as God's will here on earth as well as in Heaven, and exhort your followers to hold their government officials accountable?

Should you not preach to them as the old fighting preachers of the American Revolution preached?














Wednesday, November 13, 2013

"Christianity Today" Shows What's Wrong with Crhistianity, these Days

One look at the website of "Christianity Today" shows without a doubt that Christians have lost their way. Compare this pap to reading what and how the fighting pastors of the American Revolution preached, and you can immediately see what I mean.

Just take this article written by a "coach and  a parent" who exhorts football coaches not to call their team mates "pussies" "a bunch of girls" when trying to encourage them to play better. He says everyone should reflect whether that's in line with Jesus heart for women.

If that is what makes the front page of Christianity today, you already know that fighting evil and tyranny and pushing individual Liberty is no longer on the front burner of the editors of that website, if it ever was. Getting on boys' asses for throwing like girls does not demean women the least. What a crock! It's a fact that women in general, unless specifically trained to do, suck at throwing projectiles over long distances. So what? How does that demean them? Does the accusation that men suck at giving birth demean them? Give me a break!

What should concern the editors of this PC rag is that we have a "president" in the white house who openly supports Islamist terrorists with US military weaponry paid for by US taxpayers, a "president" whose white house visitors list is topped by extremist-leaning Muslim clerics and "scholars" pushing for (and getting) Muslim Brotherhood influence.

What should concern "Christianity Today" is that this "president" is forbidding US chaplains from preaching the gospel to our servicemen while encouraging all kinds of homosexual and Muslim aberrations and while pruging our military of 200 of our top brass generals and colonewls who refuse tho shoot at Americans in case of martial law.

The way to defeat the enemy is not to water down your message so your enemies "like you better" by becoming more "acceptable" to them. What does it make you when you are "acceptable"  to your enemy? It makes you one of them. Period!

"Christianity Today" might as well call itself "Enemies of Christ, Today."



Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Pulpits of the American Revolution

Every red-blooded American would do well to read this:

http://www.christianheritagemins.org/articles/Preachers%20and%20Pulpits%20of%20the%20American%20Revolution.pdf

What a pale and emaciated shadow of this our current-day preachers are!

VETERANS DAY - After all of the blood our soldiers shed, why are we less and less free?

I wish there was a way to ensure that we can honor the sacrifice for Liberty our fallen soldiers made at the altar of global corporate governance - but there isn't.

All that is left to us now is to honor their sacrifice, for sacrifice they surely did, and most likely with the most sincere intention to offer themselves so that Americans could be and forever remain free. It galls me to have to say, though, that their sacrifice is marred by one big thing that is almost wholly outside of their control: the actual reason for their fighting and dying.

At no time since WWII (maybe with the lone exception of America's invasion of Grenada under Reagan) has an American soldier died in battle or sustained wounds in battle that can be said to have helped defend American freedom. Virtually all of our military engagements since then were fought under the aegis of the United Nations, and they were all against tiny nations that had no hope of defending themselves against the US onslaught - much less posing any viable threat to the United States. I will spare you the history lesson. You can research this yourself or tell me where I am wrong.

In Vietnam, US soldiers were sent in as cannon-fodder for the Vietcong Army. Insane directives forbade our soldiers from attacking any Vietcong formations unless they were shot at (and likely killed) first. Similar rules of engagement were issued in Gulf War II. Who can fight a war under these circumstances?

Our recent "wars"  entirely fell under the heading "U.N. Police Actions" and were in the vast majority of instances dictated by mega-corporate interests. It is a crying shame and a scandal of historic proportions that this (a) has occurred for this long, and (b) that Americans have consistently supported these types of actions and whitewashed them with the band-aid of "Oh, I'm just supporting our troops."

If you truly support our troops, you don't waste their lives on wars that have nothing to do with preserving American freedom. It's a nice bromide to tell yourself - but it doesn't change the fact.

If you really want to thank a Veteran, please heed this advice.